<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Personalized Search: How Much Should We Care?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emergence-media.com/2007/02/googles-personalized-search-how-much-should-we-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emergence-media.com/2007/02/googles-personalized-search-how-much-should-we-care/</link>
	<description>Between the Internet (Social Media) and Marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google Universal Search and SEO: SEO is Dead Part 2 at Emergence Media</title>
		<link>http://www.emergence-media.com/2007/02/googles-personalized-search-how-much-should-we-care/#comment-51319</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Universal Search and SEO: SEO is Dead Part 2 at Emergence Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emergence-media.com/2007/02/googles-personalized-search-how-much-should-we-care/#comment-51319</guid>
		<description>[...] Google’s Personalized Search: How Much Should We Care? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google’s Personalized Search: How Much Should We Care? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel R</title>
		<link>http://www.emergence-media.com/2007/02/googles-personalized-search-how-much-should-we-care/#comment-4787</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 07:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emergence-media.com/2007/02/googles-personalized-search-how-much-should-we-care/#comment-4787</guid>
		<description>@ Yolanda:

Great point! Personal Information is already commoditized via Claritas and others, but people cant commoditized they own personal information to sell to companies. 

That would be a very interesting paradigm shift - like people getting paid to wear t-shirts that say CK or purses that has the "Coach" logo all over them? Instead of paying more because of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Yolanda:</p>
<p>Great point! Personal Information is already commoditized via Claritas and others, but people cant commoditized they own personal information to sell to companies. </p>
<p>That would be a very interesting paradigm shift - like people getting paid to wear t-shirts that say CK or purses that has the &#8220;Coach&#8221; logo all over them? Instead of paying more because of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yolanda Applegate</title>
		<link>http://www.emergence-media.com/2007/02/googles-personalized-search-how-much-should-we-care/#comment-4636</link>
		<dc:creator>Yolanda Applegate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 03:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emergence-media.com/2007/02/googles-personalized-search-how-much-should-we-care/#comment-4636</guid>
		<description>Does it bother no one that this company (Google) gets all this personal information on you free-of-charge? Last time I checked they were a for-profit corporation in the bizness of making money and here you are giving away your 411 with no grease on the backside?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it bother no one that this company (Google) gets all this personal information on you free-of-charge? Last time I checked they were a for-profit corporation in the bizness of making money and here you are giving away your 411 with no grease on the backside?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel R</title>
		<link>http://www.emergence-media.com/2007/02/googles-personalized-search-how-much-should-we-care/#comment-4198</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emergence-media.com/2007/02/googles-personalized-search-how-much-should-we-care/#comment-4198</guid>
		<description>Ddas77 and Mike,

Personalization can be a great tool, but obviously can get in the way sometimes. I'd like to see something like Amazon.com's recommendation system, where they show you the "generic" results along with "Recommended Links".


To Mike:

SEO will continue to evolve to something more complex for sure, but my question is: Are enough people using Google Accounts at this time to make Google Personalization matter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ddas77 and Mike,</p>
<p>Personalization can be a great tool, but obviously can get in the way sometimes. I&#8217;d like to see something like Amazon.com&#8217;s recommendation system, where they show you the &#8220;generic&#8221; results along with &#8220;Recommended Links&#8221;.</p>
<p>To Mike:</p>
<p>SEO will continue to evolve to something more complex for sure, but my question is: Are enough people using Google Accounts at this time to make Google Personalization matter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddas77</title>
		<link>http://www.emergence-media.com/2007/02/googles-personalized-search-how-much-should-we-care/#comment-4181</link>
		<dc:creator>ddas77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 08:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emergence-media.com/2007/02/googles-personalized-search-how-much-should-we-care/#comment-4181</guid>
		<description>Personalized search is good in the sense that you can keep track of the searches you made and the resultant links you clicked on. It helps when you are trying to find that hard to remember URL or web page that you had visited weeks ago.

I use Google search rapidly and also the Search history often. More of all I heavily use the Bookmarks &#38; Personalized Home also. Google Reader is also in my usage list though limited. But they are all friendly and helpful.

I think we should care about it. If not there is infringement or leak of our personal/private preferences and other information, causing harm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personalized search is good in the sense that you can keep track of the searches you made and the resultant links you clicked on. It helps when you are trying to find that hard to remember URL or web page that you had visited weeks ago.</p>
<p>I use Google search rapidly and also the Search history often. More of all I heavily use the Bookmarks &amp; Personalized Home also. Google Reader is also in my usage list though limited. But they are all friendly and helpful.</p>
<p>I think we should care about it. If not there is infringement or leak of our personal/private preferences and other information, causing harm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.emergence-media.com/2007/02/googles-personalized-search-how-much-should-we-care/#comment-4128</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emergence-media.com/2007/02/googles-personalized-search-how-much-should-we-care/#comment-4128</guid>
		<description>I agree that the personalised search results become, the more difficult SEO becomes. 

As a user though, I don't like personalised search. I want to see what Google thinks is number one for a particular term, not what it thinks I'd like to see. I trust Google when it comes to evaluating website; not when it comes to evaluating ME.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the personalised search results become, the more difficult SEO becomes. </p>
<p>As a user though, I don&#8217;t like personalised search. I want to see what Google thinks is number one for a particular term, not what it thinks I&#8217;d like to see. I trust Google when it comes to evaluating website; not when it comes to evaluating ME.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Персонализировать иль нет - вот в чем вопрос. : Talks about blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.emergence-media.com/2007/02/googles-personalized-search-how-much-should-we-care/#comment-4117</link>
		<dc:creator>Персонализировать иль нет - вот в чем вопрос. : Talks about blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emergence-media.com/2007/02/googles-personalized-search-how-much-should-we-care/#comment-4117</guid>
		<description>[...] Posted on February 12, 2007 Тэги: seoОдин из моих предыдущих постов об опасности персонализации для СЕО вызвал живые дискуссию в некоторых кругах. Предлагаются как разумные, так и совсем безумные методы &#8220;борьбы&#8221; с этим явлением. Но большая часть откликов обычно сводится к русскому &#8220;авось&#8221; и &#8220;Фигня-война, главное маневры. Прорвемся&#8221;. В принципе, это ожидаемые реакционные отзывы, с которыми трудно не согласиться. Уже не в первый раз на &#8220;хитрый фильтр находился скрипт винтом&#8221; :) Но в большей степени, меня поразила в очередной раз некая деструктивность мышления - &#8220;сломаем, найдем дырку, обманем&#8221;. Тоже логично - такие действия проще автоматизировать и запустить массово. Однако, по моему личному убеждению не стоит сосредотачиваться только на таких методах - возможно стоит все же обратить свое внимание на тактики предлагаемые &#8220;белыми&#8221;, позаимствовать их решения и автоматизировать их. Что же на текущий момент предлагают &#8220;белые&#8221;? Одну из самых лучших тактик я пока что прочел в заметке Google’s Personalized Search: How Much Should We Care? на сайте Emergence Media. Привожу краткий перевод: Возможности персонализации Google и тактика СЕО: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posted on February 12, 2007 Тэги: seoОдин из моих предыдущих постов об опасности персонализации для СЕО вызвал живые дискуссию в некоторых кругах. Предлагаются как разумные, так и совсем безумные методы &#8220;борьбы&#8221; с этим явлением. Но большая часть откликов обычно сводится к русскому &#8220;авось&#8221; и &#8220;Фигня-война, главное маневры. Прорвемся&#8221;. В принципе, это ожидаемые реакционные отзывы, с которыми трудно не согласиться. Уже не в первый раз на &#8220;хитрый фильтр находился скрипт винтом&#8221; :) Но в большей степени, меня поразила в очередной раз некая деструктивность мышления - &#8220;сломаем, найдем дырку, обманем&#8221;. Тоже логично - такие действия проще автоматизировать и запустить массово. Однако, по моему личному убеждению не стоит сосредотачиваться только на таких методах - возможно стоит все же обратить свое внимание на тактики предлагаемые &#8220;белыми&#8221;, позаимствовать их решения и автоматизировать их. Что же на текущий момент предлагают &#8220;белые&#8221;? Одну из самых лучших тактик я пока что прочел в заметке Google’s Personalized Search: How Much Should We Care? на сайте Emergence Media. Привожу краткий перевод: Возможности персонализации Google и тактика СЕО: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
