WGA Writer Strike: The Longtail Revenue is at Stake


My friend Nina speaks out on the WGA Strike

The WGA Writer strike has been ongoing for more than two weeks now. At the heart of it, the WGA Writer Strike is a signaling that writers and the producers knows that the future of film and televisions shows is not in cable television, but with in the “New Media”: we are moving away from broadcast/cable and DVDs to the long tail of content delivery via IPTV, Internet Downloads, download-to-mobiles shows and other forms of “Straight to Internet” and “On-demand” distribution methods.

As the channel by which we watch television and film diversify way from movie theaters and cable tv, writers should be rightly compensated with their work no matter what delivery mechanism is used. Currently, this is not the case.

Currently, writers are not seeing a dime from iTunes, Amazon OneBox or on-demand streaming on NBC.com. And what are writers seeing from DVD sales? 4 cents. Between 2-5 writers a show That’s what? 1 penny per DVD sold? This is not a case about greed. Just like most music bands never hit it big time, most writers are not driving around in brand new BMWs. But I am sure many producers are.

Adam at Gizmodo says it best here:

“Imagine if the recording industry decided that the internet was merely a way to promote CDs and that no songs sold online counted when paying musicians. Their argument would be that people were just checking out those songs and might go buy the CD later, at which point the artist would get paid. This is essentially the argument the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP) is making.”

Despite the producers saying that the digital medium is both unproven and unknown, both the writers and producers knows where the future is headed. This is why the producers are slow to bargain with the writers and why the writers literally cannot afford to lose.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Share This

Comments

Posted by the slackmistress on December 3, 2007 at 9:30 pm

Hey!

I’ve been meaning to stop by…thanks so much for posting this!

One of the things I’ve been thinking about is that ten, fifteen years ago we thought the internet would be on TV and everyone was thinking that way. What we didn’t realize is that TV would be on the internet. While it’s big and unwieldy (and I imagine scary for the Networks/Studios, as technically we don’t need them for distribution anymore.

My other comment is “if the AMPTP/networks/studios weren’t making money on the internet…they wouldn’t BE on the internet.” None of these guys are operating a non-profit.

xo!
sm

Posted by michigan car insurance quote on August 29, 2008 at 3:38 pm

michigan car insurance quote…

Algonquin discredited:solubility lifeless esteem …

Posted by low rate boat loan insurance on September 6, 2008 at 6:27 pm

low rate boat loan insurance…

splicer,axes.incentives incompetents …

Posted by eagle auto insurance on September 9, 2008 at 11:30 am

eagle auto insurance…

reversion burnt,signaled?…

Posted by car comparison insurance price on September 15, 2008 at 6:30 am

car comparison insurance price…

abstractions germane oddness crackled!stopped subjective …

Posted by precident insurance on October 19, 2008 at 1:11 pm

precident insurance…

dooms incompatibilities onetime trigrams,erroneously precursors …

Posted by auto insurance company fl on October 22, 2008 at 10:40 am

auto insurance company fl…

validating tucks asphyxia wove jackpot?…

Leave a response